blob: f67fe4a757d8659ff9ec60ba0b69a8ea5a29859e [file] [log] [blame]
Erik Andersen2e397342000-04-19 04:34:06 +00001From alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Thu Apr 13 08:07:22 2000
2Return-Path: <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
3Delivered-To: andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com
4Received: from localhost (dillweed.dsl.xmission.com [10.0.0.1])
5 by dillweed.dsl.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D57A11A4F5
6 for <andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:07:22 -0600 (MDT)
7Envelope-to: andersen@xmission.com
8Received: from mail.xmission.com
9 by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.3.3)
10 for andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com (single-drop); Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:07:22 -0600 (MDT)
11Received: from [194.168.151.1] (helo=the-village.bc.nu)
12 by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #3)
13 id 12fhQk-0002OZ-00
14 for andersen@xmission.com; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 05:05:03 -0600
15Received: from alan by the-village.bc.nu with local (Exim 2.12 #1)
16 id 12fhQ9-0002nD-00
17 for andersen@xmission.com; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:04:25 +0100
18Subject: Re: kernel ps drivers [Was: vm locking question]
19To: andersen@xmission.com
20Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 12:04:23 +0100 (BST)
21In-Reply-To: <20000412224130.A2748@xmission.com> from "Erik Andersen" at Apr 12, 2000 10:41:30 PM
22X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1]
23MIME-Version: 1.0
24Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
25Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
26Message-Id: <E12fhQ9-0002nD-00@the-village.bc.nu>
27From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
28Status: RO
29X-Status: A
30Content-Length: 242
31Lines: 6
32
33> On the subject of ps, would you be willing to accept my /dev/ps
34> patch into the kernel? If no, any suggestions on what should
35> be done differently (if anything) to make it worthy of inclusion?
36
37For 2.2.x no, for 2.3.x ask Linus not me
38
39
40From torvalds@transmeta.com Thu Apr 13 09:18:16 2000
41Return-Path: <torvalds@transmeta.com>
42Delivered-To: andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com
43Received: from localhost (dillweed.dsl.xmission.com [10.0.0.1])
44 by dillweed.dsl.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3776411A3DF
45 for <andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:18:16 -0600 (MDT)
46Envelope-to: andersen@xmission.com
47Received: from mail.xmission.com
48 by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.3.3)
49 for andersen@dillweed.dsl.xmission.com (single-drop); Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:18:16 -0600 (MDT)
50Received: from [209.10.217.66] (helo=neon-gw.transmeta.com)
51 by mail.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #3)
52 id 12flK2-0004dd-00
53 for andersen@xmission.com; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 09:14:22 -0600
54Received: (from root@localhost)
55 by neon-gw.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA18635;
56 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:10:51 -0700
57Received: from mailhost.transmeta.com(10.1.1.15) by neon-gw.transmeta.com via smap (V2.1)
58 id xma018629; Thu, 13 Apr 00 08:10:25 -0700
59Received: from penguin.transmeta.com (root@penguin.transmeta.com [10.1.2.202])
60 by deepthought.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA12264;
61 Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
62Received: from localhost (torvalds@localhost) by penguin.transmeta.com (8.9.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA02051; Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:13:53 -0700
63X-Authentication-Warning: penguin.transmeta.com: torvalds owned process doing -bs
64Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 08:13:53 -0700 (PDT)
65From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
66To: Erik Andersen <andersen@xmission.com>
67Cc: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com>
68Subject: Re: kernel ps drivers [Was: vm locking question]
69In-Reply-To: <20000413083127.A976@xmission.com>
70Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10004130812170.2000-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
71MIME-Version: 1.0
72Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
73Status: RO
74Content-Length: 659
75Lines: 16
76
77
78
79On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Erik Andersen wrote:
80>
81> For 2.3.x would you be willing to accept my /dev/ps driver into the kernel?
82> (Assuming I remove the /dev/modules driver (since it was pointed out that there
83> is a perfectly good syscall providing that interface). If no, is there anything
84> that could be done differently (if anything) to make it worthy of inclusion?
85
86I do dislike /dev/ps mightily. If the problem is that /proc is too large,
87then the right solution is to just clean up /proc. Which is getting done.
88And yes, /proc will be larger than /dev/ps, but I still find that
89preferable to having two incompatible ways to do the same thing.
90
91 Linus
92
93