File-copy from v4.4.100

This is the result of 'cp' from a linux-stable tree with the 'v4.4.100'
tag checked out (commit 26d6298789e695c9f627ce49a7bbd2286405798a) on
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git

Please refer to that tree for all history prior to this point.

Change-Id: I8a9ee2aea93cd29c52c847d0ce33091a73ae6afe
diff --git a/net/dccp/ackvec.c b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3de0d03
--- /dev/null
+++ b/net/dccp/ackvec.c
@@ -0,0 +1,405 @@
+/*
+ *  net/dccp/ackvec.c
+ *
+ *  An implementation of Ack Vectors for the DCCP protocol
+ *  Copyright (c) 2007 University of Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
+ *  Copyright (c) 2005 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
+ *
+ *      This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ *      under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
+ *      Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License;
+ */
+#include "dccp.h"
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+static struct kmem_cache *dccp_ackvec_slab;
+static struct kmem_cache *dccp_ackvec_record_slab;
+
+struct dccp_ackvec *dccp_ackvec_alloc(const gfp_t priority)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec *av = kmem_cache_zalloc(dccp_ackvec_slab, priority);
+
+	if (av != NULL) {
+		av->av_buf_head	= av->av_buf_tail = DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN - 1;
+		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&av->av_records);
+	}
+	return av;
+}
+
+static void dccp_ackvec_purge_records(struct dccp_ackvec *av)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_record *cur, *next;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, next, &av->av_records, avr_node)
+		kmem_cache_free(dccp_ackvec_record_slab, cur);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&av->av_records);
+}
+
+void dccp_ackvec_free(struct dccp_ackvec *av)
+{
+	if (likely(av != NULL)) {
+		dccp_ackvec_purge_records(av);
+		kmem_cache_free(dccp_ackvec_slab, av);
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * dccp_ackvec_update_records  -  Record information about sent Ack Vectors
+ * @av:		Ack Vector records to update
+ * @seqno:	Sequence number of the packet carrying the Ack Vector just sent
+ * @nonce_sum:	The sum of all buffer nonces contained in the Ack Vector
+ */
+int dccp_ackvec_update_records(struct dccp_ackvec *av, u64 seqno, u8 nonce_sum)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr;
+
+	avr = kmem_cache_alloc(dccp_ackvec_record_slab, GFP_ATOMIC);
+	if (avr == NULL)
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+
+	avr->avr_ack_seqno  = seqno;
+	avr->avr_ack_ptr    = av->av_buf_head;
+	avr->avr_ack_ackno  = av->av_buf_ackno;
+	avr->avr_ack_nonce  = nonce_sum;
+	avr->avr_ack_runlen = dccp_ackvec_runlen(av->av_buf + av->av_buf_head);
+	/*
+	 * When the buffer overflows, we keep no more than one record. This is
+	 * the simplest way of disambiguating sender-Acks dating from before the
+	 * overflow from sender-Acks which refer to after the overflow; a simple
+	 * solution is preferable here since we are handling an exception.
+	 */
+	if (av->av_overflow)
+		dccp_ackvec_purge_records(av);
+	/*
+	 * Since GSS is incremented for each packet, the list is automatically
+	 * arranged in descending order of @ack_seqno.
+	 */
+	list_add(&avr->avr_node, &av->av_records);
+
+	dccp_pr_debug("Added Vector, ack_seqno=%llu, ack_ackno=%llu (rl=%u)\n",
+		      (unsigned long long)avr->avr_ack_seqno,
+		      (unsigned long long)avr->avr_ack_ackno,
+		      avr->avr_ack_runlen);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct dccp_ackvec_record *dccp_ackvec_lookup(struct list_head *av_list,
+						     const u64 ackno)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr;
+	/*
+	 * Exploit that records are inserted in descending order of sequence
+	 * number, start with the oldest record first. If @ackno is `before'
+	 * the earliest ack_ackno, the packet is too old to be considered.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_reverse(avr, av_list, avr_node) {
+		if (avr->avr_ack_seqno == ackno)
+			return avr;
+		if (before48(ackno, avr->avr_ack_seqno))
+			break;
+	}
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Buffer index and length computation using modulo-buffersize arithmetic.
+ * Note that, as pointers move from right to left, head is `before' tail.
+ */
+static inline u16 __ackvec_idx_add(const u16 a, const u16 b)
+{
+	return (a + b) % DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN;
+}
+
+static inline u16 __ackvec_idx_sub(const u16 a, const u16 b)
+{
+	return __ackvec_idx_add(a, DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN - b);
+}
+
+u16 dccp_ackvec_buflen(const struct dccp_ackvec *av)
+{
+	if (unlikely(av->av_overflow))
+		return DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN;
+	return __ackvec_idx_sub(av->av_buf_tail, av->av_buf_head);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dccp_ackvec_update_old  -  Update previous state as per RFC 4340, 11.4.1
+ * @av:		non-empty buffer to update
+ * @distance:   negative or zero distance of @seqno from buf_ackno downward
+ * @seqno:	the (old) sequence number whose record is to be updated
+ * @state:	state in which packet carrying @seqno was received
+ */
+static void dccp_ackvec_update_old(struct dccp_ackvec *av, s64 distance,
+				   u64 seqno, enum dccp_ackvec_states state)
+{
+	u16 ptr = av->av_buf_head;
+
+	BUG_ON(distance > 0);
+	if (unlikely(dccp_ackvec_is_empty(av)))
+		return;
+
+	do {
+		u8 runlen = dccp_ackvec_runlen(av->av_buf + ptr);
+
+		if (distance + runlen >= 0) {
+			/*
+			 * Only update the state if packet has not been received
+			 * yet. This is OK as per the second table in RFC 4340,
+			 * 11.4.1; i.e. here we are using the following table:
+			 *                     RECEIVED
+			 *                      0   1   3
+			 *              S     +---+---+---+
+			 *              T   0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
+			 *              O     +---+---+---+
+			 *              R   1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
+			 *              E     +---+---+---+
+			 *              D   3 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
+			 *                    +---+---+---+
+			 * The "Not Received" state was set by reserve_seats().
+			 */
+			if (av->av_buf[ptr] == DCCPAV_NOT_RECEIVED)
+				av->av_buf[ptr] = state;
+			else
+				dccp_pr_debug("Not changing %llu state to %u\n",
+					      (unsigned long long)seqno, state);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		distance += runlen + 1;
+		ptr	  = __ackvec_idx_add(ptr, 1);
+
+	} while (ptr != av->av_buf_tail);
+}
+
+/* Mark @num entries after buf_head as "Not yet received". */
+static void dccp_ackvec_reserve_seats(struct dccp_ackvec *av, u16 num)
+{
+	u16 start = __ackvec_idx_add(av->av_buf_head, 1),
+	    len	  = DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN - start;
+
+	/* check for buffer wrap-around */
+	if (num > len) {
+		memset(av->av_buf + start, DCCPAV_NOT_RECEIVED, len);
+		start = 0;
+		num  -= len;
+	}
+	if (num)
+		memset(av->av_buf + start, DCCPAV_NOT_RECEIVED, num);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dccp_ackvec_add_new  -  Record one or more new entries in Ack Vector buffer
+ * @av:		 container of buffer to update (can be empty or non-empty)
+ * @num_packets: number of packets to register (must be >= 1)
+ * @seqno:	 sequence number of the first packet in @num_packets
+ * @state:	 state in which packet carrying @seqno was received
+ */
+static void dccp_ackvec_add_new(struct dccp_ackvec *av, u32 num_packets,
+				u64 seqno, enum dccp_ackvec_states state)
+{
+	u32 num_cells = num_packets;
+
+	if (num_packets > DCCPAV_BURST_THRESH) {
+		u32 lost_packets = num_packets - 1;
+
+		DCCP_WARN("Warning: large burst loss (%u)\n", lost_packets);
+		/*
+		 * We received 1 packet and have a loss of size "num_packets-1"
+		 * which we squeeze into num_cells-1 rather than reserving an
+		 * entire byte for each lost packet.
+		 * The reason is that the vector grows in O(burst_length); when
+		 * it grows too large there will no room left for the payload.
+		 * This is a trade-off: if a few packets out of the burst show
+		 * up later, their state will not be changed; it is simply too
+		 * costly to reshuffle/reallocate/copy the buffer each time.
+		 * Should such problems persist, we will need to switch to a
+		 * different underlying data structure.
+		 */
+		for (num_packets = num_cells = 1; lost_packets; ++num_cells) {
+			u8 len = min_t(u32, lost_packets, DCCPAV_MAX_RUNLEN);
+
+			av->av_buf_head = __ackvec_idx_sub(av->av_buf_head, 1);
+			av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head] = DCCPAV_NOT_RECEIVED | len;
+
+			lost_packets -= len;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (num_cells + dccp_ackvec_buflen(av) >= DCCPAV_MAX_ACKVEC_LEN) {
+		DCCP_CRIT("Ack Vector buffer overflow: dropping old entries\n");
+		av->av_overflow = true;
+	}
+
+	av->av_buf_head = __ackvec_idx_sub(av->av_buf_head, num_packets);
+	if (av->av_overflow)
+		av->av_buf_tail = av->av_buf_head;
+
+	av->av_buf[av->av_buf_head] = state;
+	av->av_buf_ackno	    = seqno;
+
+	if (num_packets > 1)
+		dccp_ackvec_reserve_seats(av, num_packets - 1);
+}
+
+/**
+ * dccp_ackvec_input  -  Register incoming packet in the buffer
+ */
+void dccp_ackvec_input(struct dccp_ackvec *av, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	u64 seqno = DCCP_SKB_CB(skb)->dccpd_seq;
+	enum dccp_ackvec_states state = DCCPAV_RECEIVED;
+
+	if (dccp_ackvec_is_empty(av)) {
+		dccp_ackvec_add_new(av, 1, seqno, state);
+		av->av_tail_ackno = seqno;
+
+	} else {
+		s64 num_packets = dccp_delta_seqno(av->av_buf_ackno, seqno);
+		u8 *current_head = av->av_buf + av->av_buf_head;
+
+		if (num_packets == 1 &&
+		    dccp_ackvec_state(current_head) == state &&
+		    dccp_ackvec_runlen(current_head) < DCCPAV_MAX_RUNLEN) {
+
+			*current_head   += 1;
+			av->av_buf_ackno = seqno;
+
+		} else if (num_packets > 0) {
+			dccp_ackvec_add_new(av, num_packets, seqno, state);
+		} else {
+			dccp_ackvec_update_old(av, num_packets, seqno, state);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+/**
+ * dccp_ackvec_clear_state  -  Perform house-keeping / garbage-collection
+ * This routine is called when the peer acknowledges the receipt of Ack Vectors
+ * up to and including @ackno. While based on on section A.3 of RFC 4340, here
+ * are additional precautions to prevent corrupted buffer state. In particular,
+ * we use tail_ackno to identify outdated records; it always marks the earliest
+ * packet of group (2) in 11.4.2.
+ */
+void dccp_ackvec_clear_state(struct dccp_ackvec *av, const u64 ackno)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_record *avr, *next;
+	u8 runlen_now, eff_runlen;
+	s64 delta;
+
+	avr = dccp_ackvec_lookup(&av->av_records, ackno);
+	if (avr == NULL)
+		return;
+	/*
+	 * Deal with outdated acknowledgments: this arises when e.g. there are
+	 * several old records and the acks from the peer come in slowly. In
+	 * that case we may still have records that pre-date tail_ackno.
+	 */
+	delta = dccp_delta_seqno(av->av_tail_ackno, avr->avr_ack_ackno);
+	if (delta < 0)
+		goto free_records;
+	/*
+	 * Deal with overlapping Ack Vectors: don't subtract more than the
+	 * number of packets between tail_ackno and ack_ackno.
+	 */
+	eff_runlen = delta < avr->avr_ack_runlen ? delta : avr->avr_ack_runlen;
+
+	runlen_now = dccp_ackvec_runlen(av->av_buf + avr->avr_ack_ptr);
+	/*
+	 * The run length of Ack Vector cells does not decrease over time. If
+	 * the run length is the same as at the time the Ack Vector was sent, we
+	 * free the ack_ptr cell. That cell can however not be freed if the run
+	 * length has increased: in this case we need to move the tail pointer
+	 * backwards (towards higher indices), to its next-oldest neighbour.
+	 */
+	if (runlen_now > eff_runlen) {
+
+		av->av_buf[avr->avr_ack_ptr] -= eff_runlen + 1;
+		av->av_buf_tail = __ackvec_idx_add(avr->avr_ack_ptr, 1);
+
+		/* This move may not have cleared the overflow flag. */
+		if (av->av_overflow)
+			av->av_overflow = (av->av_buf_head == av->av_buf_tail);
+	} else {
+		av->av_buf_tail	= avr->avr_ack_ptr;
+		/*
+		 * We have made sure that avr points to a valid cell within the
+		 * buffer. This cell is either older than head, or equals head
+		 * (empty buffer): in both cases we no longer have any overflow.
+		 */
+		av->av_overflow	= 0;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The peer has acknowledged up to and including ack_ackno. Hence the
+	 * first packet in group (2) of 11.4.2 is the successor of ack_ackno.
+	 */
+	av->av_tail_ackno = ADD48(avr->avr_ack_ackno, 1);
+
+free_records:
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_from(avr, next, &av->av_records, avr_node) {
+		list_del(&avr->avr_node);
+		kmem_cache_free(dccp_ackvec_record_slab, avr);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ *	Routines to keep track of Ack Vectors received in an skb
+ */
+int dccp_ackvec_parsed_add(struct list_head *head, u8 *vec, u8 len, u8 nonce)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_parsed *new = kmalloc(sizeof(*new), GFP_ATOMIC);
+
+	if (new == NULL)
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+	new->vec   = vec;
+	new->len   = len;
+	new->nonce = nonce;
+
+	list_add_tail(&new->node, head);
+	return 0;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_ackvec_parsed_add);
+
+void dccp_ackvec_parsed_cleanup(struct list_head *parsed_chunks)
+{
+	struct dccp_ackvec_parsed *cur, *next;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(cur, next, parsed_chunks, node)
+		kfree(cur);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(parsed_chunks);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dccp_ackvec_parsed_cleanup);
+
+int __init dccp_ackvec_init(void)
+{
+	dccp_ackvec_slab = kmem_cache_create("dccp_ackvec",
+					     sizeof(struct dccp_ackvec), 0,
+					     SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
+	if (dccp_ackvec_slab == NULL)
+		goto out_err;
+
+	dccp_ackvec_record_slab = kmem_cache_create("dccp_ackvec_record",
+					     sizeof(struct dccp_ackvec_record),
+					     0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN, NULL);
+	if (dccp_ackvec_record_slab == NULL)
+		goto out_destroy_slab;
+
+	return 0;
+
+out_destroy_slab:
+	kmem_cache_destroy(dccp_ackvec_slab);
+	dccp_ackvec_slab = NULL;
+out_err:
+	DCCP_CRIT("Unable to create Ack Vector slab cache");
+	return -ENOBUFS;
+}
+
+void dccp_ackvec_exit(void)
+{
+	kmem_cache_destroy(dccp_ackvec_slab);
+	dccp_ackvec_slab = NULL;
+	kmem_cache_destroy(dccp_ackvec_record_slab);
+	dccp_ackvec_record_slab = NULL;
+}