DOC ONLY: fix doc bugs

multiarch support: change autotools -> cmake
getting a patch reviewed: improve patch conflict resolution section

Change-Id: I2f07e1d3f21dd8cefb4d4bb3b451965d9314211a
Signed-off-by: Dave Barach <dave@barachs.net>
diff --git a/docs/gettingstarted/developers/gitreview.rst b/docs/gettingstarted/developers/gitreview.rst
index e32d8c5..a962d25 100644
--- a/docs/gettingstarted/developers/gitreview.rst
+++ b/docs/gettingstarted/developers/gitreview.rst
@@ -140,10 +140,24 @@
     $ git reset --hard origin/master
     $ git checkout master
 
-Resolving a Conflict
---------------------------------
+Patch Conflict Resolution
+-------------------------
 
-If a change has a conflict it should be resolved by entering:
+Two different patch conflict scenarios arise from time to
+time. Sometime after uploading a patch to https://gerrit.fd.io, the
+gerrit UI may show a patch status of "Merge Conflict."
+
+Or, you may attempt to upload a new patch-set via "git review," only to
+discover that the gerrit server won't allow the upload due to an upstream
+merge conflict.
+
+In both cases, it's [usually] fairly simple to fix the problem. You
+need to rebase the patch onto master/latest. Details vary from case to
+case.
+
+Here's how to rebase a patch previously uploaded to the Gerrit server
+which now has a merge conflict. In a fresh workspace cloned from
+master/latest, do the following:
 
 .. code-block:: console
 
@@ -154,5 +168,17 @@
           $ git rebase --continue
     $ git review
 
+In the upload-failure case, use caution: carefully **save your work**
+before you do anything else! 
 
+Rebase your patch and try again. Please **do not** re-download ["git
+review -d"] the patch from the gerrit server...:
+
+.. code-block:: console
+
+    $ git rebase origin/master
+       while (conflicts)
+          <fix conflicts>
+          $ git rebase --continue
+    $ git review
 
diff --git a/docs/gettingstarted/developers/multiarch/nodefns.rst b/docs/gettingstarted/developers/multiarch/nodefns.rst
index ad68385..a43d40e 100644
--- a/docs/gettingstarted/developers/multiarch/nodefns.rst
+++ b/docs/gettingstarted/developers/multiarch/nodefns.rst
@@ -117,44 +117,22 @@
 shows up with a name of the form "xxx_inline.isra.1", it's quite likely
 that the inline was declared "static inline" instead of "always_inline".
 
-Add the required Makefile.am content
-------------------------------------
+Modify CMakeLists.txt
+---------------------
 
-If the component in question already sets a "multiversioning_sources"
-variable, simply add the indicated .c file to the list. If not, add
-the required boilerplate:
+If the component in question already lists "MULTIARCH_SOURCES", simply
+add the indicated .c file to the list.  Otherwise, add as shown
+below. Note that the added file "new_multiarch_node.c" should appear in
+*both* SOURCES and MULTIARCH_SOURCES:
 
 ::
 
-    if CPU_X86_64
-    sdp_multiversioning_sources =			\
-    	sdp/node.c				\
-    	sdp/sdp_slookup.c
+    add_vpp_plugin(myplugin
+      SOURCES
+      new_multiarch_node.c
+      ...  
 
-    if CC_SUPPORTS_AVX2
-    ###############################################################
-    # AVX2
-    ###############################################################
-    libsdp_plugin_avx2_la_SOURCES = $(sdp_multiversioning_sources)
-    libsdp_plugin_avx2_la_CFLAGS =					\
-    	$(AM_CFLAGS)  @CPU_AVX2_FLAGS@				\
-    	-DCLIB_MARCH_VARIANT=avx2
-    noinst_LTLIBRARIES += libsdp_plugin_avx2.la
-    sdp_plugin_la_LIBADD += libsdp_plugin_avx2.la
-    endif
-
-    if CC_SUPPORTS_AVX512
-    ###############################################################
-    # AVX512
-    ###############################################################
-    libsdp_plugin_avx512_la_SOURCES = $(sdp_multiversioning_sources)
-    libsdp_plugin_avx512_la_CFLAGS =				\
-    	$(AM_CFLAGS) @CPU_AVX512_FLAGS@				\
-    	-DCLIB_MARCH_VARIANT=avx512
-    noinst_LTLIBRARIES += libsdp_plugin_avx512.la
-    sdp_plugin_la_LIBADD += libsdp_plugin_avx512.la
-    endif
-    endif
-
-A certain amount of cut-paste-modify is currently required. Hopefully
-we'll manage to improve the scheme in the future.
+      MULTIARCH_SOURCES
+      new_ multiarch_node.c
+      ...
+     )