| .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution |
| .. 4.0 International License. |
| .. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| .. Copyright 2019 Nokia; Copyright 2017-2018 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.; Copyright 2017 AT&T Intellectual Property. |
| |
| Open Network Automation Platform Overview |
| ========================================= |
| |
| The Open Network Automation Platform (ONAP) project addresses the |
| rising need for a **common automation platform for telecommunication, cable, |
| and cloud service providers**—and their solution providers— that enables the |
| **automation of different lifecycle processes**, to deliver differentiated |
| network services on demand, profitably and competitively, while leveraging |
| existing investments. |
| |
| Prior to ONAP, telecommunication network operators had to keep up with the |
| scale and cost of manual changes required to implement new service offerings, |
| from installing new data center equipment to, in some cases, upgrading |
| customer equipment on-premises. Many operators are seeking to exploit |
| Software Defined Network (SDN) and Network Function Virtualization (NFV) |
| to improve service velocity, simplify equipment interoperability and |
| integration, and reduce overall CapEx and OpEx costs. In addition, the |
| current, highly fragmented management landscape makes it difficult to |
| monitor and guarantee service-level agreements (SLAs). |
| |
| ONAP is addressing these challenges by developing global and massive |
| scale (multi-site and multi-Virtual Infrastructure Manager (VIM)) |
| automation capabilities for both physical and virtual network elements. |
| It facilitates service agility by supporting data models for rapid |
| service and resource deployment, by providing a common set of Northbound |
| REST APIs that are open and interoperable, and by supporting model |
| driven interfaces to the networks. ONAP’s modular and layered nature |
| improves interoperability and simplifies integration, allowing it to |
| support multiple VNF environments by integrating with multiple VIMs, |
| virtualized network function managers (VNFMs), SDN Controllers, and |
| even legacy equipment. ONAP’s consolidated VNF requirements enable |
| commercial development of ONAP-compliant VNFs. This approach allows |
| network and cloud operators to optimize their physical and virtual |
| infrastructure for cost and performance; at the same time, ONAP’s |
| use of standard models reduces integration and deployment costs of |
| heterogeneous equipment, while minimizing management fragmentation. |
| |
| Scope of ONAP |
| ------------- |
| |
| ONAP enables end user organizations and their network or cloud providers |
| to collaboratively instantiate network elements and services in a dynamic, |
| closed control loop process, with real-time response to actionable events. |
| |
| ONAP’s major activities, that is designing, deploying and operating |
| services, are provided based on ONAP’s two major frameworks, namely on |
| Design-time framework and Run-time framework: |
| |
| .. image:: media/ONAP_main_functions.png |
| :scale: 40 % |
| |
| In order to design, deploy and operate services and assure these dynamic |
| services, ONAP activities are built up as follows: |
| |
| * **Service design** – Service design is built on a robust design framework that |
| allows specification of the service in all aspects – modeling the resources and |
| relationships that make up the service, specifying the policy rules that guide |
| the service behavior, specifying the applications, analytics and closed control |
| loop events needed for the elastic management of the service. |
| * **Service deployment** – Service deployment is built on an orchestration |
| and control framework that is policy-driven (Service Orchestrator and |
| Controllers) to provide automated instantiation of the service when |
| needed and managing service demands in an elastic manner. |
| * **Service operations** – Service operations are built on an analytic |
| framework that closely monitors the service behavior during the service |
| lifecycle based on the specified design, analytics and policies to enable |
| response as required from the control framework, to deal with situations |
| ranging from those that require healing to those that require scaling |
| of the resources to elastically adjust to demand variations. |
| |
| ONAP enables product- or service-independent capabilities for design, |
| deployment and operation, in accordance with the following foundational |
| principles: |
| |
| 1. Ability to dynamically introduce full service lifecycle orchestration |
| (design, provisioning and operation) and service API for new services |
| and technologies without the need for new platform software releases |
| or without affecting operations for the existing services |
| |
| 2. Carrier-grade scalability including horizontal scaling (linear scale-out) |
| and distribution to support large number of services and large networks |
| |
| 3. Metadata-driven and policy-driven architecture to ensure flexible and |
| automated ways in which capabilities are used and delivered |
| |
| 4. The architecture shall enable sourcing best-in-class components |
| |
| 5. Common capabilities are ‘developed’ once and ‘used’ many times |
| |
| 6. Core capabilities shall support many diverse services and infrastructures |
| |
| 7. The architecture shall support elastic scaling as needs grow or shrink |
| |
| Functional overview of ONAP |
| =========================== |
| |
| The following guidelines show the main ONAP activities in a chronological order, presenting ONAP's functional structure: |
| |
| 1. **Service design** - ONAP supports Service Design operations, using the TOSCA approach. |
| These service design activities are built up of the following subtasks: |
| a. Planning VNF onboarding – checking which VNFs will be necessary for the required environment and features |
| b. Creating resources, composing services |
| c. Distributing services - Distributing services constitutes of 2 subtasks: |
| * TOSCA C-SAR package is stored in the Catalog |
| * new service notification is published |
| |
| 2. **Service orchestration and deployment** |
| a. Defining which VNFs are necessary for the service |
| b. Defining orchestration steps |
| c. Selecting valid cloud region |
| d. Service orchestration calling cloud APIs to deploy VNFs |
| * The onboarding and instantiation of VNFs in ONAP is represented via |
| the example of onboarding and instantiating a virtual network function |
| (VNF), the virtual Firewall (vFirewall). Following the guidelines and |
| steps of this example, any other VNF can be similarly onboarded |
| and instantiated to ONAP. See :ref:`virtual Firewall Onboarding and |
| Instantiating <vfirewall_usecase>` examples. |
| e. Controllers applying configuration on VNFs |
| 3. **Service operations** |
| a. Closed Loop design and deployment |
| b. Collecting and evaluating event data |
| |
| Benefits of ONAP |
| ================ |
| |
| Open Network Automation Platform provides the following benefits: |
| |
| * common automation platform, which enables common management of services and |
| connectivity, while the applications run separately |
| * a unified operating framework for vendor-agnostic, policy-driven service |
| design, implementation, analytics and lifecycle management for |
| large-scale workloads and services |
| * orchestration for both virtual and physical network functions |
| * ONAP offers Service or VNF Configuration capability, in contrast to other |
| open-source orchestration platforms |
| * the model-driven approach enables ONAP to support services, that are using |
| different VNFs, as a common service block |
| * service modelling enables operators to use the same deployment and management |
| mechanisms, beside also using the same platform |
| |
| ONAP Release information |
| ======================== |
| |
| ONAP is enhanced with numerous features from release to release. Each release |
| is named after a city. |
| |
| +----------------------+----------------+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| |Release Name |Release version |Release Date |Features delivered | |
| +======================+================+======================+===========================================================+ |
| |Casablanca |* 3.0.2 |* 31 January 2019 | :ref:`Casablanca Release Notes <casablancarelease-notes>` | |
| | |* 3.0.1 |* 30 November 2018 | | |
| | |* 3.0.0 |* 15 April 2019 | | |
| +----------------------+----------------+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| |Beijing |2.0.0 |7 June 2018 | + |
| +----------------------+----------------+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| |Amsterdam |1.0.0 |16 November 2017 | + |
| +----------------------+----------------+----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------+ |
| |
| ONAP Blueprints and environments |
| ================================ |
| |
| ONAP is able to deploy and operate VNFs running OpenStack based Centralized Private Cloud Instances, as well as Mobile Edge Cloud instances. |
| ONAP has been tested in the following network environments: |
| |
| * Voice Over LTE (VoLTE) |
| * Customer Premise Equipment (CPE) |
| * 5G |
| * Cross Domain and Cross Layer VPN (CCVPN) |
| * Broadband Service (BBS) |
| |
| Licenses |
| ======== |
| |
| Open Network Automation Platform (ONAP) is an open source project hosted by the Linux Foundation. |
| |
| ONAP Source Code is licensed under the `Apache Version 2 License <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0>`_. |
| ONAP Documentation is licensed under the `Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
| International License <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0>`_. |