| .. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 |
| International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
| |
| .. _docs_ccvpn: |
| |
| :orphan: |
| |
| CCVPN (Cross Domain and Cross Layer VPN) |
| ---------------------------------------- |
| Update for kohn Release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The kohn release enhances the CCVPN use-case by introducing the following three features (REQ-1268): |
| 1. E-LINE (P2P connection) support for the Cloud Leased Line (CLL) service delivery |
| 2. Enhancing the Closed-Loop Automation of CCVPN services by using DCAE SDK dmaap-client lib in slice analysis MS |
| 3. Enhancing TN NSSMF NBI to align with the latest IETF specification (SO changes) |
| |
| Kohn Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Kohn release is an enhancement release. E-LINE service model (P2P connection) is added to the Cloud Leased Line (CLL) service. |
| Also, slice analysis MS is enhanced to use DCAE SDK dmaap-client lib. |
| And lastly, TN NSSMF northbound is aligned with the latest IETF transport slice definition model (SO changes). |
| |
| The impacted ONAP modules are: CCSDK, SDN-C, DCAE, and SO. |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For Kohn new features, the integration test environment is similar to that of |
| the Jakarta release: an ONAP instance with Kohn release interfacing with 3rd party |
| transport domain controllers should be established. |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The testing procedure is described in the following few test cases: |
| - Create and delete single CLL instance which accesses single cloud, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Modify the bandwidth of a connection link of an existing CLL instance, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| |
| |
| Update for Jakarta Release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Jakarta release enhances the CCVPN use-case by introducing the following three features (REG-1076): |
| 1. Support for IBN service discovery by registering Cloud Leased Line (CLL) and Transport Slicing services to MSB |
| 2. Support for 1+1 protection of Cloud Leased Line (CLL) |
| 3. Support for closed-loop and user-triggered intent update |
| |
| Jakarta Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The "CCVPN closed-loop" feature and the "user-triggered intent update" feature require both a front-end and a back-end system. |
| The front-end would be different for IBN and CCVPN, but the two features can share a common back-end. |
| As a first step, current bandwidth usage of a CLL should be collected from the physical network. Then VES collector API |
| should be called to send this information to DCAE. DCAE would then publish a new DMaaP topic to be consumed by DCAE slice |
| analysis micro-service. This module will then send this notification to Policy. |
| |
| In Jakarta, the goal of both user-triggered intent update and CCVPN closed-loop is to ensure the max-bandwidth of the CLL service |
| can satisfy user's intent throughout the intent life cycle. Thus, the modify-CLL operation triggered by DCAE and Policy is |
| common to IBN and CCVPN. So a common back-end mechanism is implemented to support both use-cases. |
| |
| The impacted ONAP modules are: CCSDK, SDN-C, A&AI, DCAE, POLICY, and SO. |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For Jakarta new features, the integration test environment is similar to that of |
| the Istanbul release: an ONAP instance with Istanbul release interfacing with 3rd party |
| transport domain controllers should be established. |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The testing procedure is described in the following few test cases: |
| - Create and delete single CLL instance which accesses single cloud, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Create and delete single CLL instance which access multiple clouds, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Create and delete multiple CLL instances which access single cloud, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Create and delete multiple CLL instances which access multiple clouds, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Create a CLL instance which have connection links with different bandwidth, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Modify the bandwidth of a connection link of an existing CLL instance, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| - Modify an existing CLL instance by add a new connection link, and monitor if the closed-loop call flow is getting triggered. |
| |
| |
| Update for Istanbul Release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Istanbul release introduces a new functionality for the CCVPN use-case: |
| Cloud Lease Line (CLL) service support. The following three main operations were |
| added in Istanbul release (REQ-719): |
| |
| 1. The support for creating an E-Tree service, which has one ROOT (Cloud POP) and may have |
| one or more LEAFs (i.e. ONUs) as its branches. |
| 2. The support for modifying the maximum bandwidth supported by a given E-Tree. |
| 3. The support for deleting an E-Tree service. |
| |
| Istanbul Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For operation #1 mentioned above, the user should be able to "create" an E-Tree service. |
| The modification operation is able to support the following scenarios: |
| |
| a. An E-Tree can have one or more branches (LEAFs) located in one or multiple (different) |
| domains. |
| b. When multiple LEAFs are physically located in a single OLT node, those LEAFs |
| should re-use or share the same OTN tunnels, therefore the path computation |
| mechanism should only be called once. |
| |
| By operation #2 mentioned above, a user can change/modify the maximum bandwidth supported |
| by a given E-Tree. |
| |
| And by operation #3 mentioned above, a user can delete a given E-Tree. |
| |
| The impacted ONAP modules are: SO, SDN-C, and A&AI. |
| |
| For A&AI, additional edge-rules were introduced between two connectivity nodes as well as |
| between a connectivity and a uni node. |
| |
| In SDN-C, additional Directed Graphs (DGs) were implemented to support the above-mentioned |
| features. These new DGs are placed under the generic-resource-api folder in SDNC. |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For Istanbul new features, the integration test environment is similar to that of |
| the Honolulu release: an ONAP instance with Istanbul release interfacing with 3rd party |
| transport domain controllers should be established. |
| |
| For E-Tree support, the installation procedure is similar to that of the E2E |
| Network Slicing use case. In other words, we need to bring up the required modules |
| including SO, ADNS, A&AI, and UUI. We also need to configure these modules along |
| with the mandatory common modules such as DMaaP. |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The testing procedure is described in the following few test cases: |
| |
| - create an E-Tree with one ROOT and one or multiple LEAF(s) in a multi-domain topology |
| - modify the maximum bw of a given E-Tree or add a new connection link to a given E-Tree |
| - delete a given E-Tree |
| |
| To run such test cases, the user must first add (register) the domain controllers as the ESR |
| 3rd party controllers. As a result of this registration, a round of topology discovery gets |
| triggered. After that, network-routes or UNI Endpoints have to be created in A&AI. This step |
| is similar to that of Guilin release, and is described in the following link: |
| https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Transport+Slicing+Configuration+and+Operation+Guidance |
| |
| Then an E-Tree creation, modification and deletion can be triggered from SO APIs. |
| |
| |
| |
| Update for Honolulu Release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Honolulu release continued to support and extend the Transport Slicing functionality |
| developed in Guilin release. Two main features were aded in Honolulu release (REQ-456): |
| |
| 1. The support for reuse and modification of an existing TN NSSI has been developed. |
| 2. In addition, the Honolulu release also continuted to support and extend the CCVPN |
| use-case and in particular, the support for inter-domain connections of three or |
| more network domains has been introduced in Honolulu release. (CCVPN in previous |
| releases were only be able to connect two domains). |
| |
| Honolulu Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For feature #1 mentioned above, the user should be able to "modify" a Transport Slice. |
| The modification operation is able to support the following three scenarios: |
| |
| a. A user may "Add" one or more new service(s)/connections link(s) to a given slice |
| (TN NSSI) that is already created. |
| b. A user may need to change or modify the maximum bandwidth attribute (i.e. the SLA |
| agreement) using which a given slice is created. |
| c. Both of the above operations. |
| |
| For feature #2 mentioned above, now in H release, we can have and support an artibrary |
| number of domains inter-connected to each other and we can support a cross-layer |
| cross-domain VPN connectivity and transport slicing for these kinds of scenarios as well. |
| |
| Impacted ONAP modules include: SO, SDN-C, CCSDK, A&AI. |
| |
| In CCSDk, a path computation engine (PCE) mechanism is introduced to support a |
| graph-based path computation in a multi-domain network topologies. This PCE system is |
| implemented as a SLI plugin to be called and used by Directed Graphs (DGs). |
| |
| For A&AI, additional attributes were introduced to the connectivity node and vpn-binding node. |
| |
| In SDN-C, additional Directed Graphs (DGs) were implemented to support the above-mentioned |
| two features. |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For Honolulu new features, the integration test environment is similar to that of the Guilin |
| release: an ONAP instance with Honolulu release interfacing to 3rd party transport domain |
| controllers should be established. |
| |
| For Transport Slicing, the installation procedure is similar to that of the E2E |
| Network Slicing use case. In other words, we need to bring up the required modules |
| including SDC, SO, A&AI, UUI and OOF. We also need to configure these modules along |
| with the mandatory common modules such as DMaaP. |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The testing procedure is described in the following few test cases: |
| |
| - service/template design: Successful design of TN NSST and Slice Profile |
| - modify max-bandwidth of existing TN NSSI: Modify the maximum bandwidth of an existing TN NSSI |
| - modify connection links existing TN NSSI: Add new connection links to existing TN NSSI |
| - modify both max-bandwidth and connection links of TN NSSI: Modify both the maximum bandwidth and add new connection links to an existing TN NSSI |
| - three-domain network: Test create TN NSSI (or other NSI life cycle operations) on a three-domain network (i.e., need 3 ACTN PNC simulators) |
| |
| |
| |
| Update for Guilin Release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| In Guilin Release, **MDONS** Extension feature is introduced. |
| |
| In addition to the MDONS extension, CCVPN has also developed an |
| IETF/ACTN-based Transport Slicing solution (REQ-347). This development |
| enabled ONAP to offer the TN NSSMF functionality, which was used by |
| the E2E Network Slicing use case (REQ-342). The solution was built |
| upon the existing IETF/ACTN E-LINE over OTN NNI feature developed in Frankfurt release. |
| |
| Guilin Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| MDONS Extension implementation for the Frankfurt release will incorporate the following: |
| |
| - Support Asynchronous OpenRoadM OTN service activation notification handling |
| - Add OOF support for inter domain link/path selection |
| - Support Closed Loop sub-use case |
| |
| Impacted ONAP modules include: OOF, SDN-C, SO and Holmes. |
| |
| `Wiki link reference <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MDONS+Extension+in+R7>`_ |
| |
| Transport Slicing in Guilin release has implemented the following TN NSSMF functionality: |
| |
| - Allocate TN NSSI |
| - Deallocate TN NSSI |
| - Activate TN NSSI |
| - Deactivate TN NSSI |
| |
| The Tranport Slicing implementation has made code changes in the following modules: |
| |
| - AAI (Schema changes only) |
| - UUI |
| - SO |
| - OOF |
| - SDN-C |
| - CCSDK |
| - Modelling |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For integration test case and description of MDONS extension, refer to this |
| `following wiki-page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Cases+-+MDONS+Extension>`_. |
| |
| For integration test case and description of Transport Slicing: |
| |
| - `Guilin Test plan <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+-+Transport+Slicing+integration+test+plan+for+Guilin+release>`_ |
| - `Guilin E2E Network Slicing <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/E2E+Network+Slicing+Use+Case+in+R7+Guilin>`_ |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For MDONS extension, the integration test environment is established to have ONAP instance with Guilin |
| release interfacing to 3rd party transport domain controllers. One controller |
| instance manages OpenROADM OTN topology and the other 2 instances manage TAPI |
| OTN topology. L0 infrastructure and WDM services are pre-provisioned to support |
| L1 topology discovery and OTN service orchestration from ONAP. |
| |
| For Transport Slicing, the installation procedure is similar to that of the E2E |
| Network Slicing use case. In other words, we need to bring up the required modules |
| including SDC, SO, A&AI, UUI and OOF. We also need to configure these modules along |
| with the mandatory common modules such as DMaaP. |
| |
| Testing Procedures |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The testing procedure is described in: |
| |
| - `Testing procedure for MDONS extension <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Integration+Test+Cases+-+MDONS+Extension>`_ |
| - `Testing procedure for Transport Slicing <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+-+Transport+Slicing+integration+test+plan+for+Guilin+release>`_ |
| |
| Update for Frankfurt release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| In Frankfurt, we introduced two extensions in CCVPN use case. One is E-LINE service over OTN NNI handover, another is the |
| multi domain optical service which aims to provide end to end layer 1 service. |
| |
| E-LINE over OTN NNI |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Description |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| It is considered a typical scenario for operators to use OTN to interconnect its multiple transport network domains. Hence |
| the capabilities of orchestrating end-to-end E-LINE services across the domains over OTN is important for ONAP. When operating |
| with multiple domains with multi vendor solutions, it is also important to define and use standard and open |
| interfaces, such as the IETF ACTN-based transport `YANG models <https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8345>`_, as the southbound interface |
| of ONAP, in order to ensure interoperability. The SOTN NNI use-case aims to automate the design, service provision by independent |
| operational entities within a service provider network by delivering E-Line over OTN orchestration capabilities into ONAP. SOTN NNI |
| extends upon the CCVPN use-case by incorporating support for L1/L2 network management capabilities leveraging open standards & common |
| data models. |
| |
| Frankfurt Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The Frankfurt demonstration includes L1(OTN) and L2(ETH) Topology discovery from multiple domains controllers with in an operator |
| and provide VPN service provision in OTN and ETH network. |
| |
| The ONAP components involved in this use case are: SDC, A&AI, UUI, SO, SDNC, OOF, MSB. |
| |
| Functional Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Usecase specific developments have been realized in SO, OOF, AAI, SDNC and UUI ONAP components.. |
| |
| Testing Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| Design time |
| SOTNVPNInfraService service design in SDC and distribute to AAI and SO. |
| |
| Run Time: |
| All operation will be triggered by UUI, including service creation and termination, |
| link management and topology network display: |
| |
| - `E-LINE over OTN Inter Domain Test Cases <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/E-LINE+over+OTN+Inter+Domain+Test+Cases>`_ |
| - `Testing status <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2%3A+Frankfurt+Release+Integration+Testing+Status>`_ |
| |
| MDONS (Multi-Domain Optical Network Services) |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Overall Description |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The MDONS use-case aims to automate the design, activation & operations resulting |
| from an optical transport (L0/L1) service request exchange between service providers and/or independent operational entities within a service provider network by delivering E2E optical orchestration capabilities into ONAP. MDONS extends upon the CCVPN use-case by incorporating support for L0/L1 network management capabilities leveraging open standards & common data models defined by OpenROADM, Transport-API & MEF. |
| |
| Frankfurt Scope and Impacted modules |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| MDONS implementation for the Frankfurt release will incorporate the following: |
| - Design & modelling of optical services based on MEF L1 subscriber & operator properties |
| - E2E optical service workflow definitions for service instantiation & deletion |
| - UI portal with L1 service instantiation templates |
| - Optical Transport domain management (topology, resource onboarding) through standard models / APIs - OpenROADM, T-API |
| Impacted ONAP modules include: A&AI, SDC, SDN-C, SO, UUI |
| |
| References: |
| |
| - `OpenROADM reference <https://github.com/OpenROADM/OpenROADM_MSA_Public>`_ |
| - `ONF Transport-API (TAPI) <https://github.com/OpenNetworkingFoundation/TAPI>`_ |
| - `MEF <https://wiki.mef.net/display/CESG/MEF+63+-+Subscriber+Layer+1+Service+Attributes>`_ |
| |
| Functional/Integration Test Cases |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| For integration test case and description, refer to this following |
| `wiki-page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MDONS+Integration+Test+Case>`_. |
| |
| Installation Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The integration test environment is established to have ONAP instance with |
| Frankfurt release interfacing to 3rd party transport domain controllers. |
| One controller instance manages OpenROADM OTN topology and the other 2 instances |
| manage TAPI OTN topology. L0 infrastructure and WDM services are pre-provisioned |
| to support L1 topology discovery and OTN service orchestration from ONAP. |
| |
| Testing Procedure |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Test environment is described in |
| `Installation and Test Procedure <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/MDONS+Integration+Test+Case>`_. |
| |
| Update for Dublin release |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| 1. Service model optimization |
| |
| In Dublin release,the design of CCVPN was optimized by having support of List type of Input in SDC. |
| During onboarding and design phase, one end to end service is created using SDC. |
| This service is composed of these two kinds of resources: |
| |
| - VPN resource |
| - Site resource |
| |
| See the `Details of Targeted Service Template wiki page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Details+of+Targeted+Service+Template>`_ |
| for details. |
| |
| 2. Closed Loop in bandwidth adjustment |
| Simulate alarm at the edge site branch and ONAP will execute close-loop automatically and trigger bandwidth to change higher. |
| |
| 3. Site Change |
| Site can be add or delete according to the requirements |
| |
| More information about: |
| |
| - `CCVPN in Dublin release <https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=45296665>`_ |
| - `Dublin test cases <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Test+Cases+for+Dublin+Release>`_ |
| - `CCVPN Test Status wiki page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Test+Status>`_ |
| |
| .. note:: |
| CCVPN integration testing coversed service design, service creation and |
| closed-loop bandwidth adjustments in Dublin release. |
| |
| The service termination and service change will continue to be tested in E release. |
| During the integration testing, SDC, SO, SDC master branch are used which |
| includes the enhanced features for CCVPN use case. |
| |
| Service used for CCVPN |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| - `SOTNVPNInfraService, SDWANVPNInfraService and SIteService <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Service+Design>`_ |
| - `WanConnectionService (Another way to describe CCVPN in a single service form which based on ONF CIM <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Wan+Connection+Service+Design>`_ |
| |
| Description |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Cross-domain, cross-layer VPN (CCVPN) is one of the use cases of the ONAP |
| Casablanca release. This release demonstrates cross-operator ONAP orchestration |
| and interoperability with third party SDN controllers and enables cross-domain, |
| cross-layer and cross-operator service creation and assurance. |
| |
| The demonstration includes two ONAP instances, one deployed by Vodafone and one |
| by China Mobile, both of which orchestrate the respective operator underlay OTN |
| networks and overlay SD-WAN networks and peer to each other for cross-operator |
| VPN service delivery. |
| |
| `CCVPN Use Case Wiki Page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN%28Cross+Domain+and+Cross+Layer+VPN%29+USE+CASE>`_ |
| |
| The projects covered by this use case include: SDC, A&AI, UUI, SO, SDNC, OOF, Policy, DCAE(Holmes), External API, MSB |
| |
| How to Use |
| ~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Design time: |
| |
| - `SOTNVPNInfraService, SDWANVPNInfraService and SIteService service Design steps <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Service+Design>`_ |
| - `WanConnectionService ( Another way to describe CCVPN in a single service form which based on ONF CIM ) <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Wan+Connection+Service+Design>`_ |
| |
| Run Time: |
| |
| - All operations will be triggered by UUI, including service creation and termination, |
| link management and topology network display. |
| |
| |
| See the `CCVPN Test Guide wiki page <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Test+Guide>`_ |
| for details. |
| |
| Test Status and Plans |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| - `All test case covered by this use case <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Integration+Test+Case>`_ |
| - `Test status <https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN++-Test+Status>`_ |
| |
| Known Issues and Resolutions |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| 1) AAI-1923. Link Management, UUI can't delete the link to external onap otn domain. |
| |
| For the manual steps provided by A&AI team, we should follow the steps as follow |
| the only way to delete is using the forceDeleteTool shell script in the graphadmin container. |
| First we will need to find the vertex id, you should be able to get the id by making the following GET request. |
| |
| GET /aai/v14/network/ext-aai-networks/ext-aai-network/createAndDelete/esr-system-info/test-esr-system-info-id-val-0?format=raw |
| |
| .. code-block:: JSON |
| |
| { |
| |
| "results": [ |
| { |
| "id": "20624", |
| "node-type": "pserver", |
| "url": "/aai/v13/cloud-infrastructure/pservers/pserver/pserverid14503-as988q", |
| "properties": {} |
| } |
| ] |
| } |
| |
| |
| Same goes for the ext-aai-network: |
| |
| GET /aai/v14/network/ext-aai-networks/ext-aai-network/createAndDelete?format=raw |
| |
| Retrieve the id from the above output as that will be the vertex id that you want to remove. |
| |
| Run the following command multiple times for both the esr-system-info and ext-aai-network: |
| |
| :: |
| |
| kubectl exec -it $(kubectl get pods -lapp=aai-graphadmin -n onap --template 'range .items.metadata.name"\n"end' | head -1) -n onap gosu aaiadmin /opt/app/aai-graphadmin/scripts/forceDeleteTool.sh -action DELETE_NODE -userId YOUR_ID_ANY_VALUE -vertexId VERTEX_ID |
| |
| From the above, remove the YOUR_ID_ANY_VALUE and VERTEX_ID with your info. |
| |
| 2) SDC-1955. Site service Distribution |
| |
| To overcome the Service distribution, the SO catalog has to be populated with the model information of the services and resources. |
| a) Refering to the Csar that is generated in the SDC designed as per the details mentioned in the below link: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/CCVPN+Service+Design |
| b) Download the Csar from SDC thus generated. |
| c) copy the csar to SO sdc controller pod and bpmn pod |
| |
| .. code-block:: bash |
| |
| kubectl -n onap get pod|grep so |
| kubectl -n onap exec -it dev-so-so-sdc-controller-c949f5fbd-qhfbl /bin/sh |
| mkdir null/ASDC |
| mkdir null/ASDC/1 |
| kubectl -n onap cp service-Sdwanvpninfraservice-csar.csar dev-so-so-bpmn-infra-58796498cf-6pzmz:null/ASDC/1/service-Sdwanvpninfraservice-csar.csar |
| kubectl -n onap cp service-Sdwanvpninfraservice-csar.csar dev-so-so-bpmn-infra-58796498cf-6pzmz:ASDC/1/service-Sdwanvpninfraservice-csar.csar |
| |
| d) populate model information to SO db: the db script example can be seen in |
| https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Manual+steps+for+CCVPN+Integration+Testing |
| |
| The same would also be applicable for the integration of the client to create the service and get the details. |
| Currently the testing has been performed using the postman calls to the corresponding APIs. |
| |
| 3) SDC-1955 & SDC-1958. Site service parsing Error |
| |
| UUI: stored the csar which created based on beijing release under a fixed directory, If site servive can't parsed by SDC tosca parser, UUI will parse this default csar and get the input parameter |
| a) Make an available csar file for CCVPN use case. |
| b) Replace uuid of available files with what existing in SDC. |
| c) Put available csar files in UUI local path (/home/uui). |
| |
| 4) SO docker branch 1.3.5 has fixes for the issues 1SO-1248 |
| |
| After SDC distribution success, copy all csar files from so-sdc-controller: |
| |
| - connect to so-sdc-controller ( eg: kubectl.exe exec -it -n onap dev-so-so-sdc-controller-77df99bbc9-stqdz /bin/sh ) |
| - find out all csar files ( eg: find / -name "\*.csar" ), the csar files should |
| be in this path: /app/null/ASDC/ ( eg: /app/null/ASDC/1/service-Sotnvpninfraservice-csar.csar ) |
| - exit from the so-sdc-controller ( eg: exit ) |
| - copy all csar files to local derectory ( eg: kubectl.exe cp onap/dev-so-so-sdc-controller-6dfdbff76c-64nf9:/app/null/ASDC/tmp/service-DemoService-csar.csar service-DemoService-csar.csar -c so-sdc-controller ) |
| |
| Copy csar files, which got from so-sdc-controller, to so-bpmn-infra: |
| |
| - connect to so-bpmn-infra ( eg: kubectl.exe -n onap exec -it dev-so-so-bpmn-infra-54db5cd955-h7f5s -c so-bpmn-infra /bin/sh ) |
| - check the /app/ASDC directory, if doesn't exist, create it ( eg: mkdir /app/ASDC -p ) |
| - exit from the so-bpmn-infra ( eg: exit ) |
| - copy all csar files to so-bpmn-infra ( eg: kubectl.exe cp service-Siteservice-csar.csar onap/dev-so-so-bpmn-infra-54db5cd955-h7f5s:/app/ASDC/1/service-Siteservice-csar.csar ) |