| Busybox Style Guide |
| =================== |
| |
| This document describes the coding style conventions used in Busybox. If you |
| add a new file to Busybox or are editing an existing file, please format your |
| code according to this style. If you are the maintainer of a file that does |
| not follow these guidelines, please -- at your own convenience -- modify the |
| file(s) you maintain to bring them into conformance with this style guide. |
| Please note that this is a low priority task. |
| |
| To help you format the whitespace of your programs, an ".indent.pro" file is |
| included in the main Busybox source directory that contains option flags to |
| format code as per this style guide. This way you can run GNU indent on your |
| files by typing 'indent myfile.c myfile.h' and it will magically apply all the |
| right formatting rules to your file. Please _do_not_ run this on all the files |
| in the directory, just your own. |
| |
| |
| Declaration Order |
| ----------------- |
| |
| Here is the order in which code should be laid out in a file: |
| |
| - commented program name and one-line description |
| - commented author name and email address(es) |
| - commented GPL boilerplate |
| - commented longer description / notes for the program (if needed) |
| - #includes and #defines |
| - const and global variables |
| - function declarations (if necessary) |
| - function implementations |
| |
| |
| Whitespace |
| ---------- |
| |
| This is everybody's favorite flame topic so let's get it out of the way right |
| up front. |
| |
| |
| Tabs vs. Spaces in Line Indentation |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| The preference in Busybox is to indent lines with tabs. Do not indent lines |
| with spaces and do not indents lines using a mixture of tabs and spaces. (The |
| indentation style in the Apache and Postfix source does this sort of thing: |
| \s\s\s\sif (expr) {\n\tstmt; --ick.) The only exception to this rule is |
| multi-line comments that use an asterisk at the beginning of each line, i.e.: |
| |
| /t/* |
| /t * This is a block comment. |
| /t * Note that it has multiple lines |
| /t * and that the beginning of each line has a tab plus a space |
| /t * except for the opening '/*' line where the slash |
| /t * is used instead of a space. |
| /t */ |
| |
| Furthermore, The preference is that tabs be set to display at four spaces |
| wide, but the beauty of using only tabs (and not spaces) at the beginning of |
| lines is that you can set your editor to display tabs at *whatever* number of |
| spaces is desired and the code will still look fine. |
| |
| |
| Operator Spacing |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Put spaces between terms and operators. Example: |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| for(i=0;i<num_items;i++){ |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| for (i = 0; i < num_items; i++) { |
| |
| While it extends the line a bit longer, the spaced version is more |
| readable. An allowable exception to this rule is the situation where |
| excluding the spacing makes it more obvious that we are dealing with a |
| single term (even if it is a compound term) such as: |
| |
| if (str[idx] == '/' && str[idx-1] != '\\') |
| |
| or |
| |
| if ((argc-1) - (optind+1) > 0) |
| |
| |
| Bracket Spacing |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| If an opening bracket starts a function, it should be on the |
| next line with no spacing before it. However, if a bracket follows an opening |
| control block, it should be on the same line with a single space (not a tab) |
| between it and the opening control block statement. Examples: |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| while (!done) |
| { |
| |
| do |
| { |
| |
| Don't do this either: |
| |
| while (!done){ |
| do{ |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| while (!done) { |
| do { |
| |
| |
| Paren Spacing |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Put a space between C keywords and left parens, but not between |
| function names and the left paren that starts it's parameter list (whether it |
| is being declared or called). Examples: |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| while(foo) { |
| for(i = 0; i < n; i++) { |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| while (foo) { |
| for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { |
| |
| But do functions like this: |
| |
| static int my_func(int foo, char bar) |
| ... |
| baz = my_func(1, 2); |
| |
| |
| Cuddled Elses |
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ |
| |
| Also, please "cuddle" your else statements by putting the else keyword on the |
| same line after the right bracket that closes an 'if' statement. |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| if (foo) { |
| stmt; |
| } |
| else { |
| stmt; |
| } |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| if (foo) { |
| stmt; |
| } else { |
| stmt; |
| } |
| |
| The exception to this rule is if you want to include a comment before the else |
| block. Example: |
| |
| if (foo) { |
| stmts... |
| } |
| /* otherwise, we're just kidding ourselves, so re-frob the input */ |
| else { |
| other_stmts... |
| } |
| |
| |
| Variable and Function Names |
| --------------------------- |
| |
| Use the K&R style with names in all lower-case and underscores occasionally |
| used to separate words (e.g., "variable_name" and "numchars" are both |
| acceptable). Using underscores makes variable and function names more readable |
| because it looks like whitespace; using lower-case is easy on the eyes. |
| |
| Note: The Busybox codebase is very much a mixture of code gathered from a |
| variety of sources. This explains why the current codebase contains such a |
| hodge-podge of different naming styles (Java, Pascal, K&R, just-plain-weird, |
| etc.). The K&R guideline explained above should therefore be used on new files |
| that are added to the repository. Furthermore, the maintainer of an existing |
| file that uses alternate naming conventions should -- at his own convenience -- |
| convert those names over to K&R style; converting variable names is a very low |
| priority task. Perhaps in the future we will include some magical Perl script |
| that can go through and convert files -- left as an exercise to the reader for |
| now. |
| |
| |
| Tip and Pointers |
| ---------------- |
| |
| The following are simple coding guidelines that should be followed: |
| |
| - When in doubt about the proper behavior of a Busybox program (output, |
| formatting, options, etc.), model it after the equivalent GNU program. |
| Doesn't matter how that program behaves on some other flavor of *NIX; |
| doesn't matter what the POSIX standard says or doesn't say, just model |
| Busybox programs after their GNU counterparts and nobody has to get hurt. |
| |
| - Don't use a '#define var 80' when you can use 'static const int var 80' |
| instead. This makes the compiler do type checking for you (rather than |
| relying on the more error-prone preprocessor) and it makes debugging |
| programs much easier since the value of the variable can be easily |
| displayed. |
| |
| - If a const variable is used in only one function, do not make it global to |
| the file. Instead, declare it inside the function body. |
| |
| - Inside applet files, all functions should be declared static so as to keep |
| the global name space clean. The only exception to this rule is the |
| "applet_main" function which must be declared extern. |
| |
| - If you write a function that performs a task that could be useful outside |
| the immediate file, turn it into a general-purpose function with no ties to |
| any applet and put it in the utility.c file instead. |
| |
| - Put all help/usage messages in usage.c. Put other strings in messages.c. |
| Putting these strings into their own file is a calculated decision designed |
| to confine spelling errors to a single place and aid internationalization |
| efforts, if needed. (Side Note: we might want to use a single file instead |
| of two, food for thought). |
| |
| - There's a right way and a wrong way to test for sting equivalence with |
| strcmp: |
| |
| The wrong way: |
| |
| if (!strcmp(string, "foo")) { |
| ... |
| |
| The right way: |
| |
| if (strcmp(string, "foo") == 0){ |
| ... |
| |
| The use of the "equals" (==) operator in the latter example makes it much |
| more obvious that you are testing for equivalence. The former example with |
| the "not" (!) operator makes it look like you are testing for an error. In |
| a more perfect world, we would have a streq() function in the string |
| library, but that ain't the world we're living in. |
| |
| - Do not use old-style function declarations that declare variable types |
| between the parameter list and opening bracket. Example: |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| int foo(parm1, parm2) |
| char parm1; |
| float parm2; |
| { |
| .... |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| int foo(char parm1, float parm2) |
| { |
| .... |
| |
| - Please use brackets on all if and else statements, even if it is only one |
| line. Example: |
| |
| Don't do this: |
| |
| if (foo) |
| stmt; |
| else |
| stmt; |
| |
| Do this instead: |
| |
| if (foo) { |
| stmt; |
| } else { |
| stmt; |
| } |
| |
| The "bracketless" approach is error prone because someday you might add a |
| line like this: |
| |
| if (foo) |
| stmt; |
| new_line(); |
| else |
| stmt; |
| |
| And the resulting behavior of your program would totally bewilder you. |
| (Don't laugh, it happens to us all.) Remember folks, this is C, not |
| Python. |