Ed Warnicke | cb9cada | 2015-12-08 15:45:58 -0700 | [diff] [blame] | 1 | Network Working Group D. Lewis |
| 2 | Internet-Draft Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 3 | Intended status: Informational P. Agarwal |
| 4 | Expires: January 5, 2015 Broadcom |
| 5 | L. Kreeger |
| 6 | F. Maino |
| 7 | P. Quinn |
| 8 | M. Smith |
| 9 | N. Yadav |
| 10 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 11 | July 4, 2014 |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | LISP Generic Protocol Extension |
| 15 | draft-lewis-lisp-gpe-02.txt |
| 16 | |
| 17 | Abstract |
| 18 | |
| 19 | This draft describes extending the Locator/ID Separation Protocol |
| 20 | (LISP) [RFC6830], via changes to the LISP header, with three new |
| 21 | capabilities: support for multi-protocol encapsulation, operations, |
| 22 | administration and management (OAM) signaling, and explicit |
| 23 | versioning. |
| 24 | |
| 25 | Status of this Memo |
| 26 | |
| 27 | This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the |
| 28 | provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79. |
| 29 | |
| 30 | Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering |
| 31 | Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute |
| 32 | working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet- |
| 33 | Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/. |
| 34 | |
| 35 | Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months |
| 36 | and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any |
| 37 | time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference |
| 38 | material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." |
| 39 | |
| 40 | This Internet-Draft will expire on January 5, 2015. |
| 41 | |
| 42 | Copyright Notice |
| 43 | |
| 44 | Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the |
| 45 | document authors. All rights reserved. |
| 46 | |
| 47 | This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal |
| 48 | Provisions Relating to IETF Documents |
| 49 | |
| 50 | |
| 51 | |
| 52 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 1] |
| 53 | |
| 54 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 57 | (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of |
| 58 | publication of this document. Please review these documents |
| 59 | carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect |
| 60 | to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must |
| 61 | include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of |
| 62 | the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as |
| 63 | described in the Simplified BSD License. |
| 64 | |
| 65 | |
| 66 | Table of Contents |
| 67 | |
| 68 | 1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 |
| 69 | 2. LISP Header Without Protocol Extensions . . . . . . . . . . . 4 |
| 70 | 3. Generic Protocol Extension for LISP (LISP-gpe) . . . . . . . . 5 |
| 71 | 3.1. Multi Protocol Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 |
| 72 | 3.2. OAM Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 |
| 73 | 3.3. Version Bits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 |
| 74 | 4. Backward Compatibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 |
| 75 | 4.1. LISP-gpe Routers to (legacy) LISP Routers . . . . . . . . 8 |
| 76 | 4.2. (legacy) LISP Routers to LISP-gpe Routers . . . . . . . . 8 |
| 77 | 4.3. Type of Service . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 |
| 78 | 4.4. VLAN Identifier (VID) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 |
| 79 | 5. LISP-gpe Examples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 |
| 80 | 6. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 |
| 81 | 7. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |
| 82 | 8. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 |
| 83 | 9. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 |
| 84 | 9.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 |
| 85 | 9.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 |
| 86 | Authors' Addresses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 |
| 87 | |
| 88 | |
| 89 | |
| 90 | |
| 91 | |
| 92 | |
| 93 | |
| 94 | |
| 95 | |
| 96 | |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 100 | |
| 101 | |
| 102 | |
| 103 | |
| 104 | |
| 105 | |
| 106 | |
| 107 | |
| 108 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 2] |
| 109 | |
| 110 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 111 | |
| 112 | |
| 113 | 1. Introduction |
| 114 | |
| 115 | LISP [RFC6830] defines an encapsulation format that carries IPv4 or |
| 116 | IPv6 (henceforth referred to as IP) packets in a LISP header and |
| 117 | outer UDP/IP transport. |
| 118 | |
| 119 | The LISP header does not specify the protocol being encapsulated and |
| 120 | therefore is currently limited to encapsulating only IP packet |
| 121 | payloads. Other protocols, most notably VXLAN [VXLAN] (which defines |
| 122 | a similar header format to LISP), are used to encapsulate L2 |
| 123 | protocols such as Ethernet. LISP [RFC6830] can be extended to |
| 124 | indicate the inner protocol, enabling the encapsulation of Ethernet, |
| 125 | IP or any other desired protocol all the while ensuring compatibility |
| 126 | with existing LISP [RFC6830] deployments. |
| 127 | |
| 128 | As LISP is deployed, there's also the need to provide increased |
| 129 | visibility and diagnostic capabilities within the overlay. |
| 130 | |
| 131 | This document describes extending LISP ([RFC6830]) via the following |
| 132 | changes: |
| 133 | |
| 134 | Next Protocol Bit (P bit): A reserved flag bit is allocated, and set |
| 135 | in the LISP-gpe header to indicate that a next protocol field is |
| 136 | present. |
| 137 | |
| 138 | OAM Flag Bit (O bit): A reserved flag bit is allocated, and set in |
| 139 | the LISP-gpe header, to indicate that the packet is an OAM packet. |
| 140 | |
| 141 | Version: Two reserved bits are allocated, and set in the LISP-gpe |
| 142 | header, to indicate LISP-gpe protocol version. |
| 143 | |
| 144 | Next protocol: An 8 bit next protocol field is present in the LISP- |
| 145 | gpe header. |
| 146 | |
| 147 | |
| 148 | |
| 149 | |
| 150 | |
| 151 | |
| 152 | |
| 153 | |
| 154 | |
| 155 | |
| 156 | |
| 157 | |
| 158 | |
| 159 | |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 162 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 3] |
| 165 | |
| 166 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 167 | |
| 168 | |
| 169 | 2. LISP Header Without Protocol Extensions |
| 170 | |
| 171 | As described in the introduction, the LISP header has no protocol |
| 172 | identifier that indicates the type of payload being carried by LISP. |
| 173 | Because of this, LISP is limited to an IP payload. Furthermore, the |
| 174 | LISP header has no mechanism to signal OAM packets. |
| 175 | |
| 176 | The LISP header contains flags (some defined, some reserved), a |
| 177 | Nonce/Map-version field and an instance ID/Locator-status-bit field. |
| 178 | The flags provide flexibility to define how the reserved bits can be |
| 179 | used to change the definition of the LISP header. |
| 180 | |
| 181 | |
| 182 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 183 | |N|L|E|V|I|flags| Nonce/Map-Version | |
| 184 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 185 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 186 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 187 | |
| 188 | |
| 189 | Figure 1: LISP Header |
| 190 | |
| 191 | |
| 192 | |
| 193 | |
| 194 | |
| 195 | |
| 196 | |
| 197 | |
| 198 | |
| 199 | |
| 200 | |
| 201 | |
| 202 | |
| 203 | |
| 204 | |
| 205 | |
| 206 | |
| 207 | |
| 208 | |
| 209 | |
| 210 | |
| 211 | |
| 212 | |
| 213 | |
| 214 | |
| 215 | |
| 216 | |
| 217 | |
| 218 | |
| 219 | |
| 220 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 4] |
| 221 | |
| 222 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 223 | |
| 224 | |
| 225 | 3. Generic Protocol Extension for LISP (LISP-gpe) |
| 226 | |
| 227 | 3.1. Multi Protocol Support |
| 228 | |
| 229 | This draft defines the following changes to the LISP header in order |
| 230 | to support multi-protocol encapsulation. |
| 231 | |
| 232 | P Bit: Flag bit 5 is defined as the Next Protocol bit. The P bit |
| 233 | MUST be set to 1 to indicate the presence of the 8 bit next |
| 234 | protocol field. |
| 235 | |
| 236 | P = 0 indicates that the payload MUST conform to LISP as defined |
| 237 | in [RFC6830]. |
| 238 | |
| 239 | Flag bit 5 was chosen as the P bit because this flag bit is |
| 240 | currently unallocated in LISP [RFC6830]. |
| 241 | |
| 242 | Next Protocol Field: The lower 8 bits of the first word are used to |
| 243 | carry a next protocol. This next protocol field contains the |
| 244 | protocol of the encapsulated payload packet. |
| 245 | |
| 246 | LISP [RFC6830] uses the lower 16 bits of the first word for either |
| 247 | a nonce, an echo-nonce ([RFC6830]) or to support map-versioning |
| 248 | ([RFC6834]). These are all optional capabilities that are |
| 249 | indicated by setting the N, E, and the V bit respectively. |
| 250 | |
| 251 | To maintain the desired data plane compatibility, when the P bit |
| 252 | is set, the N, E, and V bits MUST be set to zero. |
| 253 | |
| 254 | A new protocol registry will be requested from IANA for the Next |
| 255 | Protocol field. This draft defines the following Next Protocol |
| 256 | values: |
| 257 | |
| 258 | 0x1 : IPv4 |
| 259 | |
| 260 | 0x2 : IPv6 |
| 261 | |
| 262 | 0x3 : Ethernet |
| 263 | |
| 264 | 0x4: Network Service Header |
| 265 | |
| 266 | |
| 267 | |
| 268 | |
| 269 | |
| 270 | |
| 271 | |
| 272 | |
| 273 | |
| 274 | |
| 275 | |
| 276 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 5] |
| 277 | |
| 278 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 279 | |
| 280 | |
| 281 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 282 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 283 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 284 | |N|L|E|V|I|P|R|R| Reserved | Next Protocol | |
| 285 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 286 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 287 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 288 | |
| 289 | |
| 290 | |
| 291 | Figure 2: LISP-gpe Next Protocol (P=1) |
| 292 | |
| 293 | 3.2. OAM Support |
| 294 | |
| 295 | Flag bit 7 is defined as the O bit. When the O bit is set to 1, the |
| 296 | packet is an OAM packet and OAM processing MUST occur. The OAM |
| 297 | protocol details are out of scope for this document. As with the |
| 298 | P-bit, bit 7 is currently a reserved flag in [RFC6830]. |
| 299 | |
| 300 | |
| 301 | |
| 302 | |
| 303 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 304 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 305 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 306 | |N|L|E|V|I|P|R|O| Reserved | Next Protocol | |
| 307 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 308 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 309 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 310 | |
| 311 | |
| 312 | |
| 313 | Figure 3: LISP-gpe OAM bit (P=1) |
| 314 | |
| 315 | 3.3. Version Bits |
| 316 | |
| 317 | LISP-gpe bits8 and 9 are defined as version bits. The version field |
| 318 | is used to ensure backward compatibility going forward with future |
| 319 | LISP-gpe updates. |
| 320 | |
| 321 | The initial version for LISP-gpe is 0. |
| 322 | |
| 323 | |
| 324 | |
| 325 | |
| 326 | |
| 327 | |
| 328 | |
| 329 | |
| 330 | |
| 331 | |
| 332 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 6] |
| 333 | |
| 334 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 335 | |
| 336 | |
| 337 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 338 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 339 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 340 | |N|L|E|V|I|P|R|O|Ver| Reserved | Next Protocol | |
| 341 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 342 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 343 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 344 | |
| 345 | |
| 346 | |
| 347 | Figure 4: LISP-gpe Version bits (P=1) |
| 348 | |
| 349 | |
| 350 | |
| 351 | |
| 352 | |
| 353 | |
| 354 | |
| 355 | |
| 356 | |
| 357 | |
| 358 | |
| 359 | |
| 360 | |
| 361 | |
| 362 | |
| 363 | |
| 364 | |
| 365 | |
| 366 | |
| 367 | |
| 368 | |
| 369 | |
| 370 | |
| 371 | |
| 372 | |
| 373 | |
| 374 | |
| 375 | |
| 376 | |
| 377 | |
| 378 | |
| 379 | |
| 380 | |
| 381 | |
| 382 | |
| 383 | |
| 384 | |
| 385 | |
| 386 | |
| 387 | |
| 388 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 7] |
| 389 | |
| 390 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 391 | |
| 392 | |
| 393 | 4. Backward Compatibility |
| 394 | |
| 395 | Undefined (in RFC6830) flag bits 5 and 7, LISP-gpe P and O bits, were |
| 396 | selected to ensure compatibility with existing LISP [RFC6830] |
| 397 | deployments. |
| 398 | |
| 399 | Similarly, using P = 0 to indicate that the format of the header and |
| 400 | payload conforms to [RFC6830] ensures compatibility with existing |
| 401 | LISP hardware forwarding platforms. |
| 402 | |
| 403 | 4.1. LISP-gpe Routers to (legacy) LISP Routers |
| 404 | |
| 405 | A LISP-gpe router MUST not encapsulate non-IP packet nor OAM packets |
| 406 | to a LISP router. A method for determining the capabilities of a |
| 407 | LISP router (gpe or "legacy") is out of the scope of this draft. |
| 408 | |
| 409 | When encapsulating IP packets to a LISP router the P bit SHOULD be |
| 410 | set to 1 and the UDP port MUST be set to 4341. OAM bit MUST be set |
| 411 | to 0. The Next Protocol field SHOULD be 0x1 (IPv4) or 0x2 (IPv6). |
| 412 | The (legacy) LISP router will ignore the P bit and the protocol type |
| 413 | field. The (legacy) LISP router will treat the packet as a LISP |
| 414 | packet and inspect the first nibble of the payload to determine the |
| 415 | IP version. |
| 416 | |
| 417 | When the P bit is set, the N, E, and V bits MUST be set to zero. The |
| 418 | receiving (legacy) LISP router will ignore N, E and V bits, when the |
| 419 | P bit is set. |
| 420 | |
| 421 | 4.2. (legacy) LISP Routers to LISP-gpe Routers |
| 422 | |
| 423 | When a LISP-gpe router receives a packet from a (legacy) LISP router, |
| 424 | the P bit MUST not be set and the UDP port MUST be 4341. The payload |
| 425 | MUST be IP, and the LISP-gpe router will inspect the first nibble of |
| 426 | the payload to determine IP version. |
| 427 | |
| 428 | 4.3. Type of Service |
| 429 | |
| 430 | When a LISP-gpe router performs Ethernet encapsulation, the inner |
| 431 | 802.1Q [IEEE8021Q] priority code point (PCP) field MAY be mapped from |
| 432 | the encapsulated frame to the Type of Service field in the outer IPv4 |
| 433 | header, or in the case of IPv6 the 'Traffic Class' field. |
| 434 | |
| 435 | 4.4. VLAN Identifier (VID) |
| 436 | |
| 437 | When a LISP-gpe router performs Ethernet encapsulation, the inner |
| 438 | header 802.1Q [IEEE8021Q] VLAN Identifier (VID) MAY be mapped to, or |
| 439 | used to determine the LISP Instance ID field. |
| 440 | |
| 441 | |
| 442 | |
| 443 | |
| 444 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 8] |
| 445 | |
| 446 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 447 | |
| 448 | |
| 449 | 5. LISP-gpe Examples |
| 450 | |
| 451 | This section provides two examples of IP protocols, and one example |
| 452 | of Ethernet encapsulated LISP-gpe using the generic extension |
| 453 | described in this document. |
| 454 | |
| 455 | |
| 456 | |
| 457 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 458 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 459 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 460 | |N|L|E|V|I|1|0|0|0| Reserved | NP = IPv4 | |
| 461 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 462 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 463 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 464 | | Original IPv4 Packet | |
| 465 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 466 | |
| 467 | |
| 468 | |
| 469 | Figure 5: IPv4 and LISP-gpe |
| 470 | |
| 471 | |
| 472 | |
| 473 | |
| 474 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 475 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 476 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 477 | |N|L|E|V|I|1|0|0|0| Reserved | NP = IPv6 | |
| 478 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 479 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 480 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 481 | | Original IPv6 Packet | |
| 482 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 483 | |
| 484 | |
| 485 | |
| 486 | Figure 6: IPv6 and LISP-gpe |
| 487 | |
| 488 | |
| 489 | |
| 490 | |
| 491 | |
| 492 | |
| 493 | |
| 494 | |
| 495 | |
| 496 | |
| 497 | |
| 498 | |
| 499 | |
| 500 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 9] |
| 501 | |
| 502 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 503 | |
| 504 | |
| 505 | 0 1 2 3 |
| 506 | 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 |
| 507 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 508 | |N|L|E|V|I|1|0|0|0| Reserved | NP = Ethernet | |
| 509 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 510 | | Instance ID/Locator-Status-Bits | |
| 511 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 512 | | Original Ethernet Frame | |
| 513 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ |
| 514 | |
| 515 | |
| 516 | |
| 517 | Figure 7: Ethernet and LISP-gpe |
| 518 | |
| 519 | |
| 520 | |
| 521 | |
| 522 | |
| 523 | |
| 524 | |
| 525 | |
| 526 | |
| 527 | |
| 528 | |
| 529 | |
| 530 | |
| 531 | |
| 532 | |
| 533 | |
| 534 | |
| 535 | |
| 536 | |
| 537 | |
| 538 | |
| 539 | |
| 540 | |
| 541 | |
| 542 | |
| 543 | |
| 544 | |
| 545 | |
| 546 | |
| 547 | |
| 548 | |
| 549 | |
| 550 | |
| 551 | |
| 552 | |
| 553 | |
| 554 | |
| 555 | |
| 556 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 10] |
| 557 | |
| 558 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 559 | |
| 560 | |
| 561 | 6. Security Considerations |
| 562 | |
| 563 | LISP-gpe security considerations are similar to the LISP security |
| 564 | considerations documented at length in LISP [RFC6830]. With LISP- |
| 565 | gpe, issues such as dataplane spoofing, flooding, and traffic |
| 566 | redirection are dependent on the particular protocol payload |
| 567 | encapsulated. |
| 568 | |
| 569 | |
| 570 | |
| 571 | |
| 572 | |
| 573 | |
| 574 | |
| 575 | |
| 576 | |
| 577 | |
| 578 | |
| 579 | |
| 580 | |
| 581 | |
| 582 | |
| 583 | |
| 584 | |
| 585 | |
| 586 | |
| 587 | |
| 588 | |
| 589 | |
| 590 | |
| 591 | |
| 592 | |
| 593 | |
| 594 | |
| 595 | |
| 596 | |
| 597 | |
| 598 | |
| 599 | |
| 600 | |
| 601 | |
| 602 | |
| 603 | |
| 604 | |
| 605 | |
| 606 | |
| 607 | |
| 608 | |
| 609 | |
| 610 | |
| 611 | |
| 612 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 11] |
| 613 | |
| 614 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 615 | |
| 616 | |
| 617 | 7. Acknowledgments |
| 618 | |
| 619 | A special thank you goes to Dino Farinacci for his guidance and |
| 620 | detailed review. |
| 621 | |
| 622 | |
| 623 | |
| 624 | |
| 625 | |
| 626 | |
| 627 | |
| 628 | |
| 629 | |
| 630 | |
| 631 | |
| 632 | |
| 633 | |
| 634 | |
| 635 | |
| 636 | |
| 637 | |
| 638 | |
| 639 | |
| 640 | |
| 641 | |
| 642 | |
| 643 | |
| 644 | |
| 645 | |
| 646 | |
| 647 | |
| 648 | |
| 649 | |
| 650 | |
| 651 | |
| 652 | |
| 653 | |
| 654 | |
| 655 | |
| 656 | |
| 657 | |
| 658 | |
| 659 | |
| 660 | |
| 661 | |
| 662 | |
| 663 | |
| 664 | |
| 665 | |
| 666 | |
| 667 | |
| 668 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 12] |
| 669 | |
| 670 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 671 | |
| 672 | |
| 673 | 8. IANA Considerations |
| 674 | |
| 675 | IANA is requested to set up a registry of "Next Protocol". These are |
| 676 | 8-bit values. Next Protocol values 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 are defined in |
| 677 | this draft. New values are assigned via Standards Action [RFC5226]. |
| 678 | |
| 679 | +---------------+-------------+---------------+ |
| 680 | | Next Protocol | Description | Reference | |
| 681 | +---------------+-------------+---------------+ |
| 682 | | 0 | Reserved | This document | |
| 683 | | | | | |
| 684 | | 1 | IPv4 | This document | |
| 685 | | | | | |
| 686 | | 2 | IPv6 | This document | |
| 687 | | | | | |
| 688 | | 3 | Ethernet | This document | |
| 689 | | | | | |
| 690 | | 4 | NSH | This document | |
| 691 | | | | | |
| 692 | | 5..253 | Unassigned | | |
| 693 | +---------------+-------------+---------------+ |
| 694 | |
| 695 | Table 1 |
| 696 | |
| 697 | There are ten bits at the beginning of the LISP-gpe header. New |
| 698 | bits are assigned via Standards Action [RFC5226]. |
| 699 | |
| 700 | Bits 0-3 - Assigned by LISP [RFC6830] |
| 701 | Bit 4 - Instance ID (I bit) |
| 702 | Bit 5 - Next Protocol (P bit) |
| 703 | Bit 6 - Reserved |
| 704 | Bit 7 - OAM (O bit) |
| 705 | Bits 8-9 - Version |
| 706 | |
| 707 | |
| 708 | |
| 709 | |
| 710 | |
| 711 | |
| 712 | |
| 713 | |
| 714 | |
| 715 | |
| 716 | |
| 717 | |
| 718 | |
| 719 | |
| 720 | |
| 721 | |
| 722 | |
| 723 | |
| 724 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 13] |
| 725 | |
| 726 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 727 | |
| 728 | |
| 729 | 9. References |
| 730 | |
| 731 | 9.1. Normative References |
| 732 | |
| 733 | [RFC0768] Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768, |
| 734 | August 1980. |
| 735 | |
| 736 | [RFC0791] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, |
| 737 | September 1981. |
| 738 | |
| 739 | [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate |
| 740 | Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. |
| 741 | |
| 742 | [RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an |
| 743 | IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226, |
| 744 | May 2008. |
| 745 | |
| 746 | 9.2. Informative References |
| 747 | |
| 748 | [ETYPES] The IEEE Registration Authority, "IEEE 802 Numbers", 2012, |
| 749 | <http://www.iana.org/assignments/ieee-802-numbers/ |
| 750 | ieee-802-numbers.xml>. |
| 751 | |
| 752 | [IEEE8021Q] |
| 753 | The IEEE Computer Society, "Media Access Control (MAC) |
| 754 | Bridges and Virtual Bridge Local Area Networks", August |
| 755 | 2012, <http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/ |
| 756 | 802.1Q-2011.pdf>. |
| 757 | |
| 758 | [RFC1700] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC 1700, |
| 759 | October 1994. |
| 760 | |
| 761 | [RFC6830] Farinacci, D., Fuller, V., Meyer, D., and D. Lewis, "The |
| 762 | Locator/ID Separation Protocol (LISP)", RFC 6830, |
| 763 | January 2013. |
| 764 | |
| 765 | [RFC6834] Iannone, L., Saucez, D., and O. Bonaventure, "Locator/ID |
| 766 | Separation Protocol (LISP) Map-Versioning", RFC 6834, |
| 767 | January 2013. |
| 768 | |
| 769 | [VXLAN] Dutt, D., Mahalingam, M., Duda, K., Agarwal, P., Kreeger, |
| 770 | L., Sridhar, T., Bursell, M., and C. Wright, "VXLAN: A |
| 771 | Framework for Overlaying Virtualized Layer 2 Networks over |
| 772 | Layer 3 Networks", 2013. |
| 773 | |
| 774 | |
| 775 | |
| 776 | |
| 777 | |
| 778 | |
| 779 | |
| 780 | Lewis, et al. Expires January 5, 2015 [Page 14] |
| 781 | |
| 782 | Internet-Draft LISP Generic Protocol Extension July 2014 |
| 783 | |
| 784 | |
| 785 | Authors' Addresses |
| 786 | |
| 787 | Darrel Lewis |
| 788 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 789 | |
| 790 | Email: darlewis@cisco.com |
| 791 | |
| 792 | |
| 793 | Puneet Agarwal |
| 794 | Broadcom |
| 795 | |
| 796 | Email: pagarwal@broadcom.com |
| 797 | |
| 798 | |
| 799 | Larry Kreeger |
| 800 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 801 | |
| 802 | Email: kreeger@cisco.com |
| 803 | |
| 804 | |
| 805 | Fabio Maino |
| 806 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 807 | |
| 808 | Email: fmaino@cisco.com |
| 809 | |
| 810 | |
| 811 | Paul Quinn |
| 812 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 813 | |
| 814 | Email: paulq@cisco.com |
| 815 | |
| 816 | |
| 817 | Michael Smith |
| 818 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 819 | |
| 820 | Email: michsmit@cisco.com |
| 821 | |
| 822 | |
| 823 | Navindra Yadav |
| 824 | Cisco Systems, Inc. |
| 825 | |
| 826 | Email: nyadav@cisco.com |