blob: 70d6931d4137971e4f0189b9b2813bc3a9c52cf4 [file] [log] [blame]
Gary Wuc3ae5e92018-11-29 11:54:52 -08001.. _integration-s3p:
2
3ONAP Casablanca S3P Improvements
4--------------------------------
5
6For the Casablanca release, ONAP continues to improve in multiple
7areas of Scalability, Security, Stability and Performance (S3P)
8metrics.
9
10
11
12Stability
13=========
14Integration Stability Testing verifies that the ONAP platform remains fully functional after running for an extended amounts of time. This is done by repeated running tests against an ONAP instance for a period of 72 hours.
15
16Methodology
17~~~~~~~~~~~
18
19The Stability Test has two main components:
20
21- Running "ete stability72hr" Robot suite periodically. This test suite verifies that ONAP can instantiate vDNS, vFWCL, and VVG.
22- Set up vFW Closed Loop to remain running, then check periodically that the closed loop functionality is still working.
23
24Detailed instructions on how these tests are run can be found at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Stability+Testing+Instructions .
25
26Results: 100% PASS
27~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
28=============== ======== ========= =========
29Test Case Attempts Successes Pass Rate
30=============== ======== ========= =========
31Stability72hr 65 65 100%
32vFW Closed Loop 71 71 100%
33**Total** 136 136 **100%**
34=============== ======== ========= =========
35
36Detailed results can be found at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Stability+Testing+Status .
37
38.. note::
39 - The Wind River lab OpenStack instance sporadically returns authentication failures or dropped network connections under load. The
40 Stability72hr test runs that failed due to these known infrastructure issues were discarded.
41 - The Packet Generator VNF used in the vFW Closed Loop test becomes unstable after long run-times. The vFWCL test runs that failed
42 due to Packet Generator failures (which are not ONAP platform failures) were discarded.
43
44
45Resilience
46==========
47
48Integration Resilience Testing verifies that ONAP can automatically recover from failures of any of its components. This is done by deleting the ONAP pods that are involved in each particular Use Case flow and then checking that the Use Case flow can again be executed successfully after ONAP recovers.
49
50Methodology
51~~~~~~~~~~~
52For each Use Case, a list of the ONAP components involved is identified. The pods of each of those components are systematically deleted one-by-one; after each pod deletion, we wait for the pods to recover, then execute the Use Case again to verify successful ONAP platform recovery.
53
54
55Results: 96.9% PASS
56~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
57=============================== ======== ========= =========
58Use Case Attempts Successes Pass Rate
59=============================== ======== ========= =========
60VNF Onboarding and Distribution 45 44 97.8%
61VNF Instantiation 54 52 96.3%
62vFW Closed Loop 61 59 96.7%
63**Total** 160 155 **96.9%**
64=============================== ======== ========= =========
65
66Detailed results can be found at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Stability+Testing+Status .
67
68
69Deployability
70=============
71
72Smaller ONAP container images footprint reduces resource consumption,
73time to deploy, time to heal, as well as scale out resources.
74
75Minimizing the footprint of ONAP container images reduces resource
76consumption, time to deploy, time and time to heal. It also reduces
77the resources needed to scale out and time to scale in. For those
78reasons footprint minimization postively impacts the scalability of
79the ONAP platform. Smaller ONAP container images footprint reduces
80resource consumption, time to deploy, time to heal, as well as scale
81out resources.