blob: 43d9ab2bca93317975520b91ae69ad86d7a67521 [file] [log] [blame]
Tommy Carpenter53786ca2020-02-28 09:17:46 -05001.. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2.. SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-4.0
3.. Copyright (C) 2020 AT&T Intellectual Property
4
5xapp-frame-py Overview
6======================
7
8This library is a framework for writing Xapps in python.
9There may or may not be many Xapps written in python; however rmr, sdl, and logging libraries all exist for python, and this framework brings them together.
10
Tommy Carpenter99a0b482020-03-03 10:21:24 -050011There are (at the time of writing) two "kinds" of Xapps one can instantiate with this framework that model "push" (RMR Xapps) and "pull" (General Xapps), as described below.
Tommy Carpenter53786ca2020-02-28 09:17:46 -050012
13RMR Xapps
14---------
15This class of Xapps are purely reactive to rmr; data is always "pushed" to it via rmr.
16That is, every time the Xapp receives an rmr message, they do something, then wait for the next message to arrive, end never need to execute functionality at another time (if they do, use the next class).
17This is represented by a very simple callback `consume` that is invoked every time an rmr message arrives (note, this is subject to change, with more callbacks for specific messages like `A1_POLICY_REQUEST`).
18An analogy of this is AWS Lambda: "execute this code every time an event comes in" (the code to execute can depend on the type of event).
19
Tommy Carpenter99a0b482020-03-03 10:21:24 -050020General Xapps
21-------------
Tommy Carpenter53786ca2020-02-28 09:17:46 -050022In this class of Xapp the user simply provides a function that gets invoked, and typically that function has a `while (something)` in it.
23If the function returns, the Xapp will stop.
24In this type of Xapp, the Xapp must "pull" it's own data, typically from SDL, rmr (ie query another component for data), or other sources.
25The framework is "lighter" in this case then the former; it sets up an SDL connection, an rmr thread, and then calls the client provided function.
26This is to be used for Xapps that are not purely event driven.
27
28RMR Threading in the framework
29------------------------------
30NOTE: this is an implementation detail!
31We expose this for transparency but most users will not have to worry about this.
32
33In both types of Xapp, the framework launches a seperate thread whose only job is to read from rmr and deposit all messages (and their summaries) into a thread safe queue.
Tommy Carpenter99a0b482020-03-03 10:21:24 -050034When the client Xapp reads using the framework (this read is done by the framework itself in the RMR Xapp, but by the client in a general Xapp), the read is done from the queue.
Tommy Carpenter53786ca2020-02-28 09:17:46 -050035The framework is implemented this way so that a long running client function (e.g., consume) cannot block rmr reads.
36This is important because rmr is *not* a persistent message bus, if any rmr client does not read "fast enough", messages can be lost.
37So in this framework the client code is not in the same thread as the rmr reads, so that long running client code can never lead to lost messages.
38
39Examples
40--------
Tommy Carpenter99a0b482020-03-03 10:21:24 -050041There are two examples in the `examples` directory; `ping` which is a general Xapp, and `pong` which is an RMR Xapp.
42Ping sends a message, pong receives the message and use rts to reply.
43Ping then reads it's own mailbox and demonstrates other functionality.
44The highlight to note is that `pong` is purely reactive, it only does anything when a message is received.
45Ping uses a general that also happens to read it's rmr mailbox inside.
Tommy Carpenter53786ca2020-02-28 09:17:46 -050046
47Current gaps
48------------
49The following are known gaps or potential enhancements at the time of writing.
50::
51
52 * a logger has to be provided to the xapp
53 * the ability to specify more callacks per message type?
54